Community Development Programme
The
community development programme was started in India just after independence
(1952). It was a multi project programme with the aim of an overall
development of rural people. This programme consisted of agriculture,
animal husbandry, irrigation, cooperation, public health, education, social
education, communication, village industries etc. In fact all these
aspects of life relate to the 80 per cent of India’s farming population.
There are officials for each activity at district level to plan, execute and
evaluate the programme up to the village level.
Community development is an exclusive term. It is frequently used to encompass any and every effort towards the advance of community interests. A variety of interpretations are therefore easily available. Community development is a compound term. It is useful, therefore, to consider its components.
The Community:
A community is a group of people, who live in a geographical area and have interests in each other for the purpose of making a living
.
It is a farm of social organization existing between the family and state.
A community, while in itself consisting of several parts, is also a part of a larger social system. It is a dynamic social unit which is subject to change of internal or external origin. Some of the important characteristics of the community are
1. Communities are close-knit
2. Their customs are interrelated
3. These communities are complexes of sub-group relationship and
4. There is a discernible leadership within the community.
Community development is an exclusive term. It is frequently used to encompass any and every effort towards the advance of community interests. A variety of interpretations are therefore easily available. Community development is a compound term. It is useful, therefore, to consider its components.
The Community:
A community is a group of people, who live in a geographical area and have interests in each other for the purpose of making a living
.
It is a farm of social organization existing between the family and state.
A community, while in itself consisting of several parts, is also a part of a larger social system. It is a dynamic social unit which is subject to change of internal or external origin. Some of the important characteristics of the community are
1. Communities are close-knit
2. Their customs are interrelated
3. These communities are complexes of sub-group relationship and
4. There is a discernible leadership within the community.
Development:
The
term development connotes growth or maturation. It implies gradual and
sequential phases of change.
By understanding the above terms, we can say that community development programmes means a programme for gradual change in a group of people living in a geographical area and have interest in each other for the purpose of making a living.
By understanding the above terms, we can say that community development programmes means a programme for gradual change in a group of people living in a geographical area and have interest in each other for the purpose of making a living.
Concepts
of Community Development:
1. Community development is a movement designed to promote better living for the whole community with the active participation and on the initiative of the community.
1. Community development is a movement designed to promote better living for the whole community with the active participation and on the initiative of the community.
2.
Community development is a balanced programme for stimulating the local
potential for growth in every direction. Its promise is of reciprocal advance
in both wealth and wealth and welfare, not on the basis of outside charity but
by building on the latent vitality of the beneficiaries themselves with the
minimum of outside aid.
3.
Community development is technically aided and locally organized self help.
4.
The term community development has come into international usage to denote the
process by which the efforts of the people themselves are united with those the
governmental authorities to improve the economic social and cultural conditions
of the communities, to integrate these communities into the life of the nation
and enable them to contribute fully to national progress.
5.
Community development is the term used to describe the technique which many
governments have adopted to reach their village people and to make more
effective use of local initiative and energy for increased production and
better living standards.
6.
Community development is a process of social action in which the people of a
community organize themselves for planning and action, define their needs and
problems.
Community
development has now set the pattern for the development of the rural people and
the rural areas. The objectives of development and the new approach it
makes to the solution of the problem of rural reconstruction, the comprehensive
nature of the programme that it is promoting. The approach to the
programme is two fold, educational and organizational. The rural people
are to be educated in the art of better living, for bringing about a change in their
attitude, for breaking away from primitive methods of production, unhygienic
says of living based on tradition and for the adopting of progressive ways
based on science and technology.
Size
of Unit:
For each community project, as at present planned, there will be approximately 300 villages with a total area of about 450 to 500 square miles, a cultivated area of about, 1,50,000 acres and a population about 2,00,000. The project area is conceived as being divided into 3 development blocks, each consisting 50,000 to 70,000. The development block, is, in turn, divided into groups of 5 villages each, each group being the field of operation for a village level worker.
For each community project, as at present planned, there will be approximately 300 villages with a total area of about 450 to 500 square miles, a cultivated area of about, 1,50,000 acres and a population about 2,00,000. The project area is conceived as being divided into 3 development blocks, each consisting 50,000 to 70,000. The development block, is, in turn, divided into groups of 5 villages each, each group being the field of operation for a village level worker.
Location
of Units:
The initial programme has been started with approximately 55 projects of rural development located in select areas in the several states of India, A certain degree of flexibility is allowed in the actual allotment of projects. Thus, while many are complete projects of about 300 villages each, some are also independent development bocks of about 100 villages each, depending upon the needs and conditions of the particular areas chosen for development
The initial programme has been started with approximately 55 projects of rural development located in select areas in the several states of India, A certain degree of flexibility is allowed in the actual allotment of projects. Thus, while many are complete projects of about 300 villages each, some are also independent development bocks of about 100 villages each, depending upon the needs and conditions of the particular areas chosen for development
Feature Community Development Programme
The
community development programme having a principle feature which gives the
ideas about programme.
1. It
has undertaken a countrywide programme of rural development. The limited
pilot approach with which the programme started was abandoned soon after in
preference to a countrywide programme. Therefore, a limited pilot
approach in the matter of educating the rural people becomes inadequate.
2. An
extension service well manned and trained is being placed right in the village
and at the block level to assist and guide the rural people.
3. A
big scheme for orientation and training of personnel has been undertaken to
provide trained workers of or the community development programme.
4.
The promotion of local leadership through education and training on a scale
commensurate with the programme of community development is now urgently called
for.
5.
The promotion of youth programmes as an integral part of the community
development programme is being taken up and will have much contribution to make
to the education of rural youth.
Organizational
Set-up for Community Development Extension Service
The organizational set-up for Community
development Programme runs form the national level through state, district and
block levels to the village level and there are three main constituents of this
new set-up.
1. The direct-line staff such as State Development
Commissioner, B.D.O and Village Level Worker.
2. The auxillary or specialist staff, such as
different heads of technical departments at the state and district levels and
extension officers at the block level.
3. Panchayati Raj System- The Zila Parishads,
Block Samitis and Village Panchayats.
A) National Level:
At the National level programme, the policies
are formulated by the National Development Council presided over by the Prime
Minister of India. Membership of the Council consists of the Central ministers
of the concerned ministers, chief ministers of all states, and members of the
Planning Commission. The Planning Commission provides guidance for Plan
formulation and gives it approval to annual and Five-year Plans of the states
as well as of the Centre. The Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation is
responsible for giving national guidance, policy formulation and technical
assistance in regard to Agriculture Extension and Community Development (now
Rural Development programmes). In the Agriculture department, the
Agricultural Commissioner, Government of India, assisted by a number of
assistant commissioners and directors, with the supporting staff, is in charge
of all agricultural development programmes at the national level Within this
Department, special mention may be made of the Directorate of Extension
Training responsible for the training of Extension officers, VLWs, instructors
of Village-Level Workers Training Centers and others and the Directorate of
Farm Information which is concerned with the dissemination of new agricultural
technology and innovations through various media.
B) State Level:
At state level also, there is usually a State Development Committee presided over by the Chief Minister of the state with the other concerned ministers as its members. This Committee is responsible for the state’s plan and programmes and for fixing the targets for regions and districts. Besides this committee, there are usually a number of other advisory or technical committees.
B) State Level:
At state level also, there is usually a State Development Committee presided over by the Chief Minister of the state with the other concerned ministers as its members. This Committee is responsible for the state’s plan and programmes and for fixing the targets for regions and districts. Besides this committee, there are usually a number of other advisory or technical committees.
As regards the actual administrative
functioning the State Developments Commissioner is the top-level executive
responsible for directing, coordinating and providing overall guidance for
development programmes and maintaining a two-way channel of communication
between the state governments and the Central government. He co-ordinates
the activities of different de3velopment departments, such as agriculture,
animal husbandry, co-operation, panchayati raj, health, education, irrigation,
power and electricity. The heads of these technical departments are
responsible for planning and implementing the technical programmes and for
providing the necessary technical guidance, manpower and support.
C)
District Level:
At the district level also, there is usually a District Development or District Planning Committee presided over by the District Collector or Deputy Commissioner. The other members of this committee are the heads of the departments in the district, chairman and vice-chairman of the district boards, representatives of voluntary organizations, local bodies and members of parliament and state legislatures.
In the states, where the Panchayati Raj is operating, the Zila Parishads are responsible for planning, co-ordinationg and consolidating the development programme in the district. The District collector is the key official who co-ordinates the activities of all development departments at the districts level. The district-level technical heads of agriculture, animal husbandry, co-operation, panchayats, public health, irrigation, education and rural industries are responsible for planning and implementing the development programmes relating to their departments, Administratively, they are responsible to the district collector on one hand and to their state heads of development departments on the other.
D) Block Level:
A district is subdivided into a number of community development programmes. The block development officer is the head of the block team, and co-ordinates all the activities of the development departments at the block level. He is assisted by eight extension officers form different fields, namely agriculture, animal husbandry, health, co-operation, panchayats, engineering, social education and rural industry.
At the non-official level in the states, where the Panchayati Rah has been implemented, the Panchayati samiti (also called the Block), this Samiti) has the statutory powers for formulating and executing development programmes. The Samiti is assisted by the B.D.O. and the extension officers. Wherever the panchayati Raj is not working, there are block development advisory committees.
E) Village Level:
At the village level, the multi-purpose village-level worker is the main extension staff. He is the last extension functionary in the administrative hierarchy and is the main contact person. He is responsible for all developmental work at the village level, and forms a connecting link between the various technical departments and the rural people. Usually, in a normal community development block, there are 10 village-level workers. Their number has been double in the intensive Agricultural Development Programme (IADP) blocks.
On the non-official side, usually there is Panchayat in every village or for a cluster of villages, and is responsible for planning and implementing the community development programmes and ensuring people’s participation in them.
At the district level also, there is usually a District Development or District Planning Committee presided over by the District Collector or Deputy Commissioner. The other members of this committee are the heads of the departments in the district, chairman and vice-chairman of the district boards, representatives of voluntary organizations, local bodies and members of parliament and state legislatures.
In the states, where the Panchayati Raj is operating, the Zila Parishads are responsible for planning, co-ordinationg and consolidating the development programme in the district. The District collector is the key official who co-ordinates the activities of all development departments at the districts level. The district-level technical heads of agriculture, animal husbandry, co-operation, panchayats, public health, irrigation, education and rural industries are responsible for planning and implementing the development programmes relating to their departments, Administratively, they are responsible to the district collector on one hand and to their state heads of development departments on the other.
D) Block Level:
A district is subdivided into a number of community development programmes. The block development officer is the head of the block team, and co-ordinates all the activities of the development departments at the block level. He is assisted by eight extension officers form different fields, namely agriculture, animal husbandry, health, co-operation, panchayats, engineering, social education and rural industry.
At the non-official level in the states, where the Panchayati Rah has been implemented, the Panchayati samiti (also called the Block), this Samiti) has the statutory powers for formulating and executing development programmes. The Samiti is assisted by the B.D.O. and the extension officers. Wherever the panchayati Raj is not working, there are block development advisory committees.
E) Village Level:
At the village level, the multi-purpose village-level worker is the main extension staff. He is the last extension functionary in the administrative hierarchy and is the main contact person. He is responsible for all developmental work at the village level, and forms a connecting link between the various technical departments and the rural people. Usually, in a normal community development block, there are 10 village-level workers. Their number has been double in the intensive Agricultural Development Programme (IADP) blocks.
On the non-official side, usually there is Panchayat in every village or for a cluster of villages, and is responsible for planning and implementing the community development programmes and ensuring people’s participation in them.
Philosophy of Community Development Programme
The
philosophies on which the community development programme should be based are
as follows:
1) Work based on “felt needs”
The programme should help the community to solve some of the problems which it feels are existent.
2) Work based on assumption that people want to be free form poverty and pain:
It is assumed that the members of the community want a standard of living that allows them to be free form pain caused by lack of sufficient social side it is assumed that the people have four basis wishes a) security b) recognition c) response, d) new experience.
3) It is assumed that people wish to have freedom in controlling their own lines and deciding the forms of economic, religious, education and political institutions, under which they will live.
4) People’s values given due consideration
It is presumed that co-operation, group decision-making, self initiative, social responsibility, leadership, trustworthiness and ability to work are included in the programme.
5) Self-Help
The people actually plan and work on the solution of their problems themselves. If the problems of the community are entirely ameliorated through the efforts of some outside agency, then the development of such things as group decision-making, self-initiative, self-reliance, leadership etc. will not be forthcoming and it cannot be said that the community is developing.
6) People are the greatest resource
It is by getting the participation of the people in improvement activities that they become developed.
7) The programme involves a change in attitude, habits, ways of thinking relationship among people in the level of knowledge and intellectual advancement of people, changes in their skills, i.e. practices of agriculture health etc.
1) Work based on “felt needs”
The programme should help the community to solve some of the problems which it feels are existent.
2) Work based on assumption that people want to be free form poverty and pain:
It is assumed that the members of the community want a standard of living that allows them to be free form pain caused by lack of sufficient social side it is assumed that the people have four basis wishes a) security b) recognition c) response, d) new experience.
3) It is assumed that people wish to have freedom in controlling their own lines and deciding the forms of economic, religious, education and political institutions, under which they will live.
4) People’s values given due consideration
It is presumed that co-operation, group decision-making, self initiative, social responsibility, leadership, trustworthiness and ability to work are included in the programme.
5) Self-Help
The people actually plan and work on the solution of their problems themselves. If the problems of the community are entirely ameliorated through the efforts of some outside agency, then the development of such things as group decision-making, self-initiative, self-reliance, leadership etc. will not be forthcoming and it cannot be said that the community is developing.
6) People are the greatest resource
It is by getting the participation of the people in improvement activities that they become developed.
7) The programme involves a change in attitude, habits, ways of thinking relationship among people in the level of knowledge and intellectual advancement of people, changes in their skills, i.e. practices of agriculture health etc.
Principles of Community Development
Canadians
Michael and Julie Bopp described the principles of community development as
follow:
1. Harnessing Community Tensions:
For changes to occur there must be a tension in people’s mind between the way things are and the way people want them to be. There must be a desire for change and a desire to work together to create the change.
2. Facilitating Consultation about Community Realities and Needs:
As noted in detail below, for community development to work successfully, there has to be awareness about community needs as decided upon by the community themselves, not as decided upon by outsides.
3. Maintaining Unity and Healthy Human Relations:
It is important to build respectful healthy relationship between members of the group and to work on managing conflicts as they occur so as to maintain a collective vision.
4. Developing a Common Vision of Sustainable Future:
If community development is to work, it must be sustainable and the process must include everyone. Stories abound of development processes failing because the resources or the process were not sustainable or well devised or were done without consultation. We have all seen pictures of computers lying unused because the hardware or software broke or just because people in the community didn’t actually see need for computers.
5. Supporting Core Group Development:
It is essential to encourage and support your group. Get to know the people in your group. What are their interests and skills? How much time can they dedicate to the group’s activities? Everyone needs to be clear about their capacities and the limits to their time and energy that may exist. Encourage and build up a strong support base so that the group is not dependent upon only one or two people. Make sure the group is as representative of the community as it can be-that means including and listening to the needs of women and children as well.
6. Personal Revitalization and Healing:
Good community development processes provide an opportunity for people to become empowered, energized and to undo some of the harms of the past.
7. Facilitating Learning:
The entire development process is a learning experience. People can become aware of their environment, their social and political reality and can learn how to make the steps necessary to change and improve their situation.
8. Building Effective Organizations:
Formalizing the initial volunteer group is crucial part of the development process. Creating and implementing formal organization structures creates legitimacy and respect for the organizations and lets the community know that you are serious about your endeavours. It helps keep people unified and accountable and is part of the process of developing and implementing plans and activities.
1. Harnessing Community Tensions:
For changes to occur there must be a tension in people’s mind between the way things are and the way people want them to be. There must be a desire for change and a desire to work together to create the change.
2. Facilitating Consultation about Community Realities and Needs:
As noted in detail below, for community development to work successfully, there has to be awareness about community needs as decided upon by the community themselves, not as decided upon by outsides.
3. Maintaining Unity and Healthy Human Relations:
It is important to build respectful healthy relationship between members of the group and to work on managing conflicts as they occur so as to maintain a collective vision.
4. Developing a Common Vision of Sustainable Future:
If community development is to work, it must be sustainable and the process must include everyone. Stories abound of development processes failing because the resources or the process were not sustainable or well devised or were done without consultation. We have all seen pictures of computers lying unused because the hardware or software broke or just because people in the community didn’t actually see need for computers.
5. Supporting Core Group Development:
It is essential to encourage and support your group. Get to know the people in your group. What are their interests and skills? How much time can they dedicate to the group’s activities? Everyone needs to be clear about their capacities and the limits to their time and energy that may exist. Encourage and build up a strong support base so that the group is not dependent upon only one or two people. Make sure the group is as representative of the community as it can be-that means including and listening to the needs of women and children as well.
6. Personal Revitalization and Healing:
Good community development processes provide an opportunity for people to become empowered, energized and to undo some of the harms of the past.
7. Facilitating Learning:
The entire development process is a learning experience. People can become aware of their environment, their social and political reality and can learn how to make the steps necessary to change and improve their situation.
8. Building Effective Organizations:
Formalizing the initial volunteer group is crucial part of the development process. Creating and implementing formal organization structures creates legitimacy and respect for the organizations and lets the community know that you are serious about your endeavours. It helps keep people unified and accountable and is part of the process of developing and implementing plans and activities.
9.
Networking with Resources and Allies:
Creating the networks between like minded individuals who then form a group who then network with other groups in order to learn and share skills and resources and knowledge is a crucial part of the community development process. The most effective groups are those that are well networked and work on co-operation with others in their area. Find out whether your area has a friendship school or rotary club or other group that is already working.
10. Programme Development:
It is important to have a clear programme. An as hoc approach to community development processes will not work. A programme must be developed in conjunction with the community and be about community needs and priorities. They must adhere to realistic timelines and have inbuilt monitoring and evaluation processes so that changes can be tracked. The prorgramme acts as a map to signal where it is the group going.
11. Reflection on the Process: Monitoring and Evaluation:
Monitoring and Evaluation is very important as it allows the group to track progress, identify problems, and improve upon community development processes.
12. Protecting the Process:
Community development processes are dependent upon a rant of other processes: the good will of those involved, the continuation of funds, a secure political environment, a lack of violence. Once any of these dynamics is disrupted, then negative change and conflict may occur. It is important to have risk management strategies built into your process Less well developed processes might have fallen victim to the conflict and insecurity.
Creating the networks between like minded individuals who then form a group who then network with other groups in order to learn and share skills and resources and knowledge is a crucial part of the community development process. The most effective groups are those that are well networked and work on co-operation with others in their area. Find out whether your area has a friendship school or rotary club or other group that is already working.
10. Programme Development:
It is important to have a clear programme. An as hoc approach to community development processes will not work. A programme must be developed in conjunction with the community and be about community needs and priorities. They must adhere to realistic timelines and have inbuilt monitoring and evaluation processes so that changes can be tracked. The prorgramme acts as a map to signal where it is the group going.
11. Reflection on the Process: Monitoring and Evaluation:
Monitoring and Evaluation is very important as it allows the group to track progress, identify problems, and improve upon community development processes.
12. Protecting the Process:
Community development processes are dependent upon a rant of other processes: the good will of those involved, the continuation of funds, a secure political environment, a lack of violence. Once any of these dynamics is disrupted, then negative change and conflict may occur. It is important to have risk management strategies built into your process Less well developed processes might have fallen victim to the conflict and insecurity.
Objectives
of Community Development Programme
The community development programme has for
its objectives economic development, social change and democratic growth.
These three objectives are to be promoted jointly and in such a manner that
they support one another. In India, the objective behind the community
development programme is to develop the resources of the people and to assist
each village in planning and carrying out the integrated agricultural
production. Like this, the major objectives of this project are:
- To
change the outlook of all village people.
- To
improve existing village crafts and industries and organizing new ones,
providing minimum essential health services and improving health
practices.
- Providing
required educational facilities for children and adults as well as
recreational facilities.
- Improving
housing and family living conditions of villagers.
- To
develop a responsive village leadership, village organization and
institutions.
- To
develop village people so that they become self reliant and responsible
citizens.
- To
help people that they can increase their income and quality of life.
- Organizing
or arranging trainings for voluntary local leaders like members of
panchayats, village and block advisory committees etc. and
professional community development workers like village level workers,
extension officers, block development officers.
9.
Development Programmes of Pre-independence and Post
Independence Era
10. The
present day human institution has not developed in a day or two nor in they the
creations of one man. They represent the cumulative fruit of the
endeavor, experience, thoughtful planning and patient labours of large number
of people through generations. To comprehend, understand and appreciate
the present day human institutions adequately, it is necessary to have a back
ground knowledge of the course of its growth and development since the roots of
these institutions lie deeply buried in the past, Organized extension work in
India was started during post independence the alien rule under East India
Company was largely concerned with maintenance of law and order rather than
development. However, concern for villagers and woes of toiling masses
moved saints, sheers and social leaders to launch voluntary efforts at rural
reconstruction. One can find resemblance of extension work in these
endeavors of pre-independence era.
11.
Developmental Programmes of Pre-independence
Era
12.
1) Sriniketan:
13. Early
effort at rural development was initiated by Shri. Rabandranath Tagore in 1908
by establishing youth organization in the Kaligram Progana of his Zamindari, He
tried to create a class of functionary workers who could learn to identify
themselves with the people. In 1921 he established a Rural Reconstruction
Institute at Shantiniketan in West Bengal. A group of eight villages was
the centre of the programme. This project, co-incidentally, had many
elements of extension education in both spirit and action. Activities
like demonstration on scientific methods of agriculture, training of youths,
adult education and health co-operatives were important aspects of the work
aimed to make a group of villages self-reliant. This was a very
comprehensive programme combining culture, health, education and economic
aspects of village life together. Concept of village level workers and
regeneration of village organization were put to work. This project was
closely guided by Mr. Leonard Elmhirst, an Englishman trained in economics from
USA.
Objectives of the Programme:
Objectives of the Programme:
14. 1. To
create a real interest in people for rural welfare work.
2. To study rural problems and to translate conclusions into action.
3. To help villagers develop their resources and to improve village sanitation.
2. To study rural problems and to translate conclusions into action.
3. To help villagers develop their resources and to improve village sanitation.
15. These
objectives were desired to be achieved by creating a spirit of self-help,
developing village leadership, organizing village scouts called Brati Balika,
establishing training centers for handicrafts and establishing a demonstration
centre at Shantiniketan.
16. These
demonstration centers conducted demonstration or farmer’s holding for improved
practices. Under this programmes establishment of dairy to supply pure
milk and better animals to the farmers poultry farm for development of
farmers. The students and worker of the institute were provided
facilities for training in tanning, pottery, embroidery tailoring etc.
This institute also had a mobile library and runs night schools film shows in
the rural areas.
17. Though
the institute could not get much help from the government it could not conduct
research work on the lines initially planned by R. N. Tagore and so its work
remained limited to the eight villages only. But in the course of
history, the Government of Independence India did recognize it as an important
pioneering centre of extension research in India.
18.
2) Marthandam:
19. The
work was commenced by Dr. Spencer Hatch an American Agricultural expert in
Travancore under the auspicious of young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) in
1921. The aim of the project was to bring more abundant life for rural
people. It was intended to symbolize the three-fold development, not only
spiritual, mental and physical but also economic and social. The
essential technique of the centre was ‘Self-help with intimate expert
counsel’. From the demonstration centre at Marthandam, about hundred villages
were covered through Y.M.C.A. centers in villages. The extension
secretary was appointed supervise the activities of the group.
Marthandam was in a strategic position to serve the villages. It kept prize bulls and goats, model bee-lives, demonstration plots for improving grain and vegetable seeds, poultry runs with prize laying-hens, a weaving shed, etc. Inside the centre, there was equipment like honey extractors, health charts and the items needed for other cottage vocations. At the centre, cottage vocations were taught and agricultural implements tested. The emphasis throughout was on self-help and co-operation. The successful output of this project was the Egg-selling Club. In 1939 which became a self governing body. Another co-operative society was honey club, where the villagers were taught the use of modern bee-hives and extracted honey scientifically. The honey was cured and marketed co-operatively. There were Bull clubs, weaver’s blub also. The activities conducted at centre could meet the mental, physical and spiritual needs of the villagers. The main shortcomings of the project were inadequate funds and governmental help. The activities were mainly organized the Marthandam and the village workers did not stay in villages. The religious bias of the institution was also a major hindrance in its activites.
Marthandam was in a strategic position to serve the villages. It kept prize bulls and goats, model bee-lives, demonstration plots for improving grain and vegetable seeds, poultry runs with prize laying-hens, a weaving shed, etc. Inside the centre, there was equipment like honey extractors, health charts and the items needed for other cottage vocations. At the centre, cottage vocations were taught and agricultural implements tested. The emphasis throughout was on self-help and co-operation. The successful output of this project was the Egg-selling Club. In 1939 which became a self governing body. Another co-operative society was honey club, where the villagers were taught the use of modern bee-hives and extracted honey scientifically. The honey was cured and marketed co-operatively. There were Bull clubs, weaver’s blub also. The activities conducted at centre could meet the mental, physical and spiritual needs of the villagers. The main shortcomings of the project were inadequate funds and governmental help. The activities were mainly organized the Marthandam and the village workers did not stay in villages. The religious bias of the institution was also a major hindrance in its activites.
20.
3) Gurgaon
Experiment:
21. Rural
upliftment movement on amass scale was first started by Mr. F. L. Brayne,
Deputy Commissioner in the Gurgaon district of Punjab state. He was prompted
by the backwardness, poverty and misery of the people. A village guide
had been posted to act as a channel through which the advice of the experts in
various departments could be passed on to the villagers. The programme of
introducing improved seeds, implements, the methods of cultivation etc. was
started throughout the district. As the village guides were not technical
men, very little permanent value was achieved in fact. The project could
not develop leadership in the villages that would continue work when the
village guides had left the villages.
The work again gathered momentum, after 1933, where Mr. Brayne was appointed Commission of Rural Reconstruction in the Punjab. 1935-36. Government of India granted Rs.1 crore for various rural works which acted as a stimulus. Nevertheless the project could not make much headway ass the local talent was not utilized for development process. Most of the work done by exercising authority over the people rather than by voluntary participation of local people.
The work again gathered momentum, after 1933, where Mr. Brayne was appointed Commission of Rural Reconstruction in the Punjab. 1935-36. Government of India granted Rs.1 crore for various rural works which acted as a stimulus. Nevertheless the project could not make much headway ass the local talent was not utilized for development process. Most of the work done by exercising authority over the people rather than by voluntary participation of local people.
22. 4) Gandhian Constructive Programme / Sewagram:
Self contained and self sufficient village life was the dream of Gandhiji. He was aware about the grassroots’ problems of India, rural set up and he wanted to solve these problems without intervention of any outside agency. He wanted to solve these problems by local people and through local resources. People know Gandhiji not only as a Mahatma or political agitator, but also as a social and economic reformer. He made people to understand that India lives in villages and that the common man’s upliftment is the upliftment of the country.
Self contained and self sufficient village life was the dream of Gandhiji. He was aware about the grassroots’ problems of India, rural set up and he wanted to solve these problems without intervention of any outside agency. He wanted to solve these problems by local people and through local resources. People know Gandhiji not only as a Mahatma or political agitator, but also as a social and economic reformer. He made people to understand that India lives in villages and that the common man’s upliftment is the upliftment of the country.
23. Regarding
development work in the country, he emphasized that the “salvation of India
lies in cottage industries.” They key-words of his economy are: -
Decentralized production and equal distribution of wealth
Self-sufficiency of Indian villages.
For equal distribution of wealth, cruel process of extermination was not followed but throughout the heart of the owners by persuasion and appeal to the better sense of man.
According to him self-sufficiency of Indian villages can be achieved by eradicating middlemen, so that the farmer could get the full price for his produce. He wanted that the tiller should be able to consume his own products like fruits, milk, vegetables etc. Only then will come up the true India.
For better of people he formulated an 18 point programme, which includes the promotion of village industries, basic and adult education rural sanitation, uplift of backward tribes, uplift of women, education in public health and hygiene, propagation of natural language, love for the mother tongue, economic equality, organization of kisans, labour and students and so on.
He wants to make villagers self-sufficient and also want to develop stamina which is useful against oppression and injustice. The important institutions, which were organized to foster his ideas were; all India Spinner Association, All India Village Industries Association, Gandhi Ashram at Tiruchungodi, Gandhi Niketan at Kallupatti, Gandhi Gram at Dindigal, Gandhi Sewa Sadan at Porur (Malawar), Kasturba Ashram in Trichr, Kerala. Truly speaking, the Gandhian constrictive Programme was became big institutions and simple ideas became philosophies. His emphasis on Khadi became the Charka movement and then, the All India Khadi a Village Industries Board. His thought, against untouchability and caste system, resulted in the organization of Harijan Sewak Sangh and many like this. He created leaders like Vinoba Bhave, Nehru, Jayaprakash Narayan, Mira Ben etc. who came form common stock, but got inspiration from Gandhi.
All the people engaged in reconstructive programme felt that their work was needed in a great programme for their country reconstruction. They were soldier of the Grand Army of the Father of Nation. They were builders of a new society and torchbearers of new civilization in this country which, due to their efforts, has again been recognized as an important country.
Decentralized production and equal distribution of wealth
Self-sufficiency of Indian villages.
For equal distribution of wealth, cruel process of extermination was not followed but throughout the heart of the owners by persuasion and appeal to the better sense of man.
According to him self-sufficiency of Indian villages can be achieved by eradicating middlemen, so that the farmer could get the full price for his produce. He wanted that the tiller should be able to consume his own products like fruits, milk, vegetables etc. Only then will come up the true India.
For better of people he formulated an 18 point programme, which includes the promotion of village industries, basic and adult education rural sanitation, uplift of backward tribes, uplift of women, education in public health and hygiene, propagation of natural language, love for the mother tongue, economic equality, organization of kisans, labour and students and so on.
He wants to make villagers self-sufficient and also want to develop stamina which is useful against oppression and injustice. The important institutions, which were organized to foster his ideas were; all India Spinner Association, All India Village Industries Association, Gandhi Ashram at Tiruchungodi, Gandhi Niketan at Kallupatti, Gandhi Gram at Dindigal, Gandhi Sewa Sadan at Porur (Malawar), Kasturba Ashram in Trichr, Kerala. Truly speaking, the Gandhian constrictive Programme was became big institutions and simple ideas became philosophies. His emphasis on Khadi became the Charka movement and then, the All India Khadi a Village Industries Board. His thought, against untouchability and caste system, resulted in the organization of Harijan Sewak Sangh and many like this. He created leaders like Vinoba Bhave, Nehru, Jayaprakash Narayan, Mira Ben etc. who came form common stock, but got inspiration from Gandhi.
All the people engaged in reconstructive programme felt that their work was needed in a great programme for their country reconstruction. They were soldier of the Grand Army of the Father of Nation. They were builders of a new society and torchbearers of new civilization in this country which, due to their efforts, has again been recognized as an important country.
24.
Developmental Programmes of Post-independence
Era
25.
1. Firka Development Project:
26. This
project was government sponsored and aided at the attainment of the Gandhian
ideal of Gram Swaraj by bringing about not only educational, economic, sanitary
and other improvements in villages, but also by making the people
self-confident. The scheme was launched in 1946 in 34 Firkas (group of 5
villages) throughout the state, and on April 1, 1950, it was extended to
another 50 additional Firkas at the rate of two Firkas for each state.
The selection of the Firkas was based on general backwardness of area and the
possibilities for initiating the production of handloom cloth and other cottage
industries to give a encouragement to Rural Reconstruction.
27. This
scheme was aimed at attacking the problem of rural people as well as short term
plans for the development of rural communication, water supply, formation of
panchayats, organization of co-operatives and sanitation programme. In
long term plans, to make the area self-sufficient through agricultural,
irrigational and livestock improvements and the development of Khadi and other
Cottage Industries.
The Collector was primarily was primarily responsible to see the working of the scheme in the district. Then he was assisted by rural welfare officer of the rank of Naib Tahsildar. He was put incharge of 2-3 selected Firkas. Each Firkas was divided into 5 to 10 group of villages which were put in the charge of Gram Sevaks who were of the rank of Revenue Inspecrtors. Each Firka or group of Firka was provided with special staff like agricultural field men, administrative officers, Mistries, P. W. D. supervisors and minor irrigation overseers. To associate the people with the implementation of the programme, Development committees, consisting of officials and non-officials, were constituted in each Firka. At the state level, there was a State Rural Welfare Board comprising the heads of the Departments and influential and constructive social workers.
For stimulating healthy competition between the official and non-official agencies, the Government of Madras decided to entrust the development schemes to non-official agencies were selected and paid grants for doing Firka development of :- a) Rural Reconstruction, b) Drinking water facilities, c) Sanitation d) Agriculture and Khadi and other village industries.
At the end it was realized that these efforts were restricted in scope and lacked co-ordination. There was lack of direction, support and encouragement from the central authority. However, it was provide that no extension programme which is implemented without the help and co-operation of local people could continue for long and have a desired impact on the Rural Reconstruction.
The Collector was primarily was primarily responsible to see the working of the scheme in the district. Then he was assisted by rural welfare officer of the rank of Naib Tahsildar. He was put incharge of 2-3 selected Firkas. Each Firkas was divided into 5 to 10 group of villages which were put in the charge of Gram Sevaks who were of the rank of Revenue Inspecrtors. Each Firka or group of Firka was provided with special staff like agricultural field men, administrative officers, Mistries, P. W. D. supervisors and minor irrigation overseers. To associate the people with the implementation of the programme, Development committees, consisting of officials and non-officials, were constituted in each Firka. At the state level, there was a State Rural Welfare Board comprising the heads of the Departments and influential and constructive social workers.
For stimulating healthy competition between the official and non-official agencies, the Government of Madras decided to entrust the development schemes to non-official agencies were selected and paid grants for doing Firka development of :- a) Rural Reconstruction, b) Drinking water facilities, c) Sanitation d) Agriculture and Khadi and other village industries.
At the end it was realized that these efforts were restricted in scope and lacked co-ordination. There was lack of direction, support and encouragement from the central authority. However, it was provide that no extension programme which is implemented without the help and co-operation of local people could continue for long and have a desired impact on the Rural Reconstruction.
28. 2. Etawah-Pilot Project:
The ideal of this project was conceived and born in 1947. Actually this projected was put into action in September, 1948 with headquarter a Mahewa village about 17 miles form Etawab (U. P.) First 64 villages which were then increased to 97, were covered under it. Lt. Col. Albert Maya was the originator of this project.
He started this project with the aim of introducing work on the rural reconstruction front. The Government of U.P. helped him in setting up machinery at district level and with extra staff for the project. The point 4-programme of America also provided finances.
This project had a widespread effect on educating the villagers and broadening their mental horizons. The experiment proved not only that the material was moldable, but that the saying that the villager is ignorant, conservation and incapable of improvement was an outmoded one. The project handled the rural problem by
Efforts to broaden the mental horizon of the villagers so that he might accept new and tested ideas which might then become self-generating and self-perpetuating.
Dealing with the villager’s land, his tools and his surroundings.
The method of approach used under this project was educative and persuasive rather than coercive. For getting faith and confidence of village people, it was essential to extension worker to live in the village and prove themselves as friend of rural people.
The project started as a pilot project for introduction of improved agricultural technology. It also included general awakening of all round village-upliftment activity, so that the panchayats get on a sounder-footing.
The most effective achievement of this project was that the entire area was under improved wheat crops. The area under vegetables was extended and diseases like Rinderpest and Hemorrhagic Septicemia controlled. The other programmes taken on were the construction of roads, soak pit, adoption of improved agricultural practices etc. In this project, all round development in the village life, in terms of social, economic, health and hygiene etc. were reported form the area.
Nelokheri Experiment:
Nelokheri was the part of State of Punjab and witness of displacement and destitution due to partition.
It was started to rehabilitate 7000 displaced persons from Pakistan and later integrated with the 100 surroundings villages into what came to be a rural-cum-urban township. It was built round the vocational training centre that was transferred form Kurukshetra, in July 1948 to the 1100 acres of swampy land on the Delhi-Ambala highway. The central figure of this project was Shri. S. K. Dey, later Union Minister for Communal Development and Co-operatives up to 1965. This scheme was called urban township in all the essential requirements of life, The colony has school, an agricultural farm, polytechnic training centre, dairy, poultry farm, piggery farm, horticulture, garden, printing press, garment factory, engineering workshop, soap factory and so on. This was probably as ideal experiment which provides to be comparatively more successful addressing the immediate problems of providing help to the displace people of Punjab.
The ideal of this project was conceived and born in 1947. Actually this projected was put into action in September, 1948 with headquarter a Mahewa village about 17 miles form Etawab (U. P.) First 64 villages which were then increased to 97, were covered under it. Lt. Col. Albert Maya was the originator of this project.
He started this project with the aim of introducing work on the rural reconstruction front. The Government of U.P. helped him in setting up machinery at district level and with extra staff for the project. The point 4-programme of America also provided finances.
This project had a widespread effect on educating the villagers and broadening their mental horizons. The experiment proved not only that the material was moldable, but that the saying that the villager is ignorant, conservation and incapable of improvement was an outmoded one. The project handled the rural problem by
Efforts to broaden the mental horizon of the villagers so that he might accept new and tested ideas which might then become self-generating and self-perpetuating.
Dealing with the villager’s land, his tools and his surroundings.
The method of approach used under this project was educative and persuasive rather than coercive. For getting faith and confidence of village people, it was essential to extension worker to live in the village and prove themselves as friend of rural people.
The project started as a pilot project for introduction of improved agricultural technology. It also included general awakening of all round village-upliftment activity, so that the panchayats get on a sounder-footing.
The most effective achievement of this project was that the entire area was under improved wheat crops. The area under vegetables was extended and diseases like Rinderpest and Hemorrhagic Septicemia controlled. The other programmes taken on were the construction of roads, soak pit, adoption of improved agricultural practices etc. In this project, all round development in the village life, in terms of social, economic, health and hygiene etc. were reported form the area.
Nelokheri Experiment:
Nelokheri was the part of State of Punjab and witness of displacement and destitution due to partition.
It was started to rehabilitate 7000 displaced persons from Pakistan and later integrated with the 100 surroundings villages into what came to be a rural-cum-urban township. It was built round the vocational training centre that was transferred form Kurukshetra, in July 1948 to the 1100 acres of swampy land on the Delhi-Ambala highway. The central figure of this project was Shri. S. K. Dey, later Union Minister for Communal Development and Co-operatives up to 1965. This scheme was called urban township in all the essential requirements of life, The colony has school, an agricultural farm, polytechnic training centre, dairy, poultry farm, piggery farm, horticulture, garden, printing press, garment factory, engineering workshop, soap factory and so on. This was probably as ideal experiment which provides to be comparatively more successful addressing the immediate problems of providing help to the displace people of Punjab.